Minutes of CALCOM Analysis Meeting, May 9 1997. ================================================= Agenda: Offline analysis teams for commissioning runs - V. Burkert Update on EC gain matching - L.C. Smith Summary of February test run analysis - B. Niczyporuk Note: There will be no Friday CALCOM analysis meetings during the upcoming photon run. ========================================================================== Reports: Volker Burkert presented a plan to form offline analysis teams for shift taking during the commissioning runs. The reason for having special analysis teams is to quickly obtain infomation about the detector performance, running conditions, etc. which will be needed as input into the decisison making about whether or not data taking for a specific commissioning task has been completed. During commissioning run conditions may have to be changed frequently for the study of specific detector performances and calibration procedures. A variety of skills will be needed for the members of the teams, from low level (ADC, TDC) detector analysis, knowledge about RECSIS, to more specific analysis procedures (e.g. straight tracks analysis, MIPs analysis, etc.). For the June commissioning run the CLAS_Offline group will organize these teams based on the run plan which is currently being developed. Bogdan Niczyporuk: (no report received) ================= Bogdan presented a summary of his analysis of the February test run, covering all areas of detector analysis and efficiency studies for drift chambers, TOF, Cherenkov counters and calorimeters. Some of the methods used to define efficiencies prompted heated discussions, especially in the area of electron identification. Everyone interested in the results should contact Bogdan directly. (V.B.) Cole Smith: - Update on EC Gain Matching ========== Cosmic ray runs are continuing with the forward angle calorimeter in an attempt to use MIP tracks in single pixels to gain match the photomultiplier tubes to within 10%. This technique assumes MIP muons deposit fixed energy/length in each pixel so measured energy is function only of pixel distance from PMT and pixel stack length. Attenuation lengths and gains are then derived from exponential fits. So far data-taking has been limited to Sectors 3,5,6, which have favorable acceptance for cosmic muons. Typical runs last 2 hours and provide 3.6M events, 2-3% of which survive single pixel cut. After several iterations of fitting and HV adjusting, the RMS/mean of the distribution of mean pixel energies (uncorrected for attenuation) is as follows (best case is expected value due to scintillator attenuation assuming perfectly matched gains): Measured Best Case Sector Inner Outer Inner Outer 3 11.1% 8.9% 2.2% 2.6% 5 7.6% 7.2% 3.1% 2.7% 6 15.2% 12.2% 4.4% 3.5% The substantially better results for Sector 5 simply reflect a larger number of iterations for this sector. Once the intrinic gains of the PMTs are known from the laser calibration system this process will converge more quickly.