CALCOM ANALYSIS TASKS  DECEMBER 97        
            ==================================

  (1) Highest priority should have the analysis of data that may
      affect data quality for e1 in February/March and g1 in April.

        This includes:
         
A. Stavinski   a. Cherenkov counter efficiency analysis using elastic 
A. Vlassov        ([procedure developed, needs high statistics)
K. Joo         b. same for exclusive inelastic reaction which probe different
                  electron kinematics  
               c. Determine acceptance/efficiency tables from
                  the data (theta, phi, p/B) 
                   

          
K. Joo         b. Study efficiency of level 1 triggers EC, EC.CC 
C. Smith          - W, theta, phi dependence of inclusice electron 
R. Thompson         scattering data for different threshold settings
                  - (non)uniformity of EC response to matched electrons 
                  - threshold behavior for identified electrons track-matched 
                    in DC/EC/CC
 for later ->       (- are the event types correctly assigned, when EC, EC.CC
                    is run in parallel, without prescale factors)
                  (- study spatial distribution of elastic events across 
                    Cherenkov detector area for EC.(notCC))
           
     
M. Battaglieri c. Study of the luminosity dependence of the FC normalized, 
J. Manak          live time corrected elastic ep rate (not nessarily cross 
                  section!) (are we measuring the live time correctly?) 
                  Use 1.6GeV runs with 1 - 4 nA currents.


L. Qin          d. Drift chamber efficiency analysis for HV scan. 
R. Feuerbach         (completed)

R. Thompson     e. Electron selectivity of triggers (1.6GeV - done). 
                   
J. Manak        f. Extraction of elastic cross sections ep -> e(p) 
A. Coleman         radiatively crrected, acceptance corerctions, 
H. Funsten         extend to time-based tracking 
       

S. Stepanyan    g. ep-> eX (dsigma/d(omega)dE' versus 
M. Battaglieri     theta and phi in HBT and TBT. 


        Issues related to improving the global event reconstruction. 


J. Mueller       a. continue to improve tracking efficiency, and tracking 
L. Qin              resolution, study tracking efficiency versus luminosity
                    for 1.6GeV and 4GeV runs.
 
C. Loukachine    b. TOF gain matching, software corrections, dE/dx id 
E. Smith
S. Taylor        c. TOF adjacent paddle-to-paddle timing calibration 

L. Elouadrhiri   d. particle id with identified e-h matched tracks, rf signal 
S. Stepanyan        
H. Egiyan
M. Kim              

K. Mikhailov     e. understanding the drift chamber alignment, using straight 
B. Asavapibhop      tracks from Sep/Oct run. 
A. Skabelin         Reconstruct empty target cell wall with and w/o B field

R. Minehart      f. relative DC alignment in opposite sectors using ep->ep, 
K. Joo              unfolding non-uniformities in the CLAS geometry
C. Smith            (elastic peak position versus theta, phi)

C. Smith         g. absolute energy calibration of EC and LAEC
G. Gavalian         using min. ionizing paticles and pi0 mass reconstruction
M. Battaglieri

W. Brooks        h. time calibration of EC

A. Vlassov       i. CC calibration in #photo-electrons
A. Stavinski