Since the design of the CDR, there have been several changes to the SHMS design. Recent changes include an increase in the lab angle to 40 degrees, and a change in the momentum acceptance to -10%<δ<+22%. The scattering chamber is designed for targets up to 50cm, but other criteria like the available cooling power at 12 GeV times may be a limiting factor.
The beam envelope in the detector hut is shown in Figures 1 to 8 for a δ acceptance of -10% to +22% and the target length and angle combinations listed in the caption. The green lines indicate the detector geometry. The spectrometer optics system is used in these figures, in which +X points down and +Y is beam left. Additional target length and angle combinations are illustratd in Figures 9 and 10. For guiding the design of the detectors, the scenario illustrated in Figures 1 to 8 is appropriate as it represents the needs of the currently approved experiments like E12-06-121. The nominal parameters are z=40cm and theta=40°. The numerical values for the beam sizes at the detector locations are listed in Table 1.
Table 1: SHMS detector locations and corresponding beam sizes for 40-cm target and -10< δ <+22%. The focal plane is located at 18.1m in z from the target. All dimensions given in the table are defined relative to the focal plane (z=0). No detector cuts are included.
Detector |
Z (cm) |
X (cm) |
Y (cm)
|
|
|
atm Cerenkov (front) |
-310 |
(-15,30) |
(-30,+30) |
atm Cerenkov (middle) |
-185 |
(-17,35) |
(-35,+35) |
atm Cerenkov (back) |
-60 |
(-25,+45) |
(-40,+40) |
DC1 |
-40 |
(-30,+45) |
(-40,+40) |
DC2 |
+40 |
(-35,+50) |
(-45,+45) |
S1 |
+55 |
(-40,+50) |
(-45,+45) |
C4F10 Cerenkov (front) |
+70 |
(-40,+50) |
(-45,+45) |
C4F10 Cerenkov (middle) |
+120 |
(-45,+55) |
(-45,+50) |
C4F10 Cerenkov (back) |
+170 |
(-50,+55) |
(-45,+50) |
S2 |
+265 |
(-55,+65) |
(-50,+50) |
Calorimeter (middle) |
+320 |
(-60,+65) |
(-55,+55) |
Calorimeter (back) |
+360 |
(-65,+65) |
(-60,+60) |
Figure 1: The vertical X versus the horizontal Y position at the location of the noble gas Cerenkov back plane (X is vertical in the optical coordinate system). The simulation includes all the recent design changes, with cuts at -10<δ<+22% and -20< Ytar<20cm at a scattering angle of 40 degrees (z_eff=26cm).
Figure 2: The vertical X versus the horizontal Y position at the location of the first drift chamber (X is vertical in the optical coordinate system). The simulation includes all the recent design changes, with cuts at -10<δ<+22% and -20< Ytar<20cm at a scattering angle of 40 degrees (z_eff=26cm).
Figure 3: The vertical X versus the horizontal Y position at the location of the second drift chamber (X is vertical in the optical coordinate system). The simulation includes all the recent design changes, with cuts at -10<δ<+22% and -20< Ytar<20cm at a scattering angle of 40 degrees (z_eff=26cm).
Figure 4: The vertical X versus the horizontal Y position at the location of the first hodoscope plane (X is vertical in the optical coordinate system). The simulation includes all the recent design changes, with cuts at -10<δ<+22% and -20< Ytar<20cm at a scattering angle of 40 degrees (z_eff=26cm).
Figure 5: The vertical X versus the horizontal Y position at the location of the C4F10 Cerenkov back plane (X is vertical in the optical coordinate system). The simulation includes all the recent design changes, with cuts at -10<δ<+22% and -20< Ytar<20cm at a scattering angle of 40 degrees (z_eff=26cm).
Figure 6: The vertical X versus the horizontal Y position at the location of the second hodoscope (X is vertical in the optical coordinate system). The simulation includes all the recent design changes, with cuts at -10<δ<+22% and -20< Ytar<20cm at a scattering angle of 40 degrees (z_eff=26cm).
Figure 7: The vertical X versus the horizontal Y position at the location of the quartz detector (X is vertical in the optical coordinate system). The simulation includes all the recent design changes, with cuts at -10<δ<+22% and -20< Ytar<20cm at a scattering angle of 40 degrees (z_eff=26cm).
Figure 8: The vertical X versus the horizontal Y position at the location of the calorimeter back plane (X is vertical in the optical coordinate system). The simulation includes all the recent design changes, with cuts at -10<δ<+22% and -20< Ytar<20cm at a scattering angle of 40 degrees (z_eff=26cm).
Figure 9: The vertical X versus the horizontal Y position at the detector locations (X is vertical in the optical coordinate system). The simulation includes all the recent design changes, with cuts at -10<δ<+22% and -25< Ytar<25cm at a scattering angle of 25 degrees.
Figure 10: The vertical X versus the horizontal Y position at the detector locations (X is vertical in the optical coordinate system). The simulation includes all the recent design changes, with cuts at -10<δ<+22% and -25< Ytar<25cm at a scattering angle of 40 degrees.