|
|
the laser was optimized with cw electron beam, and an output power of 311 W was achieved, as
measured with a power head installed in the vault at the outcoupling mirror. In pulsed mode with
a 1.2% duty cycle, the power measured upstairs in the Optical Control Room was 4.1 W,
indicating a power during the macropulse of 340 W (we had no power head at the outcoupling
mirror during this run). Assuming 15% losses in the optical transport line (a number that still
needs to be measured), this corresponds to 400 W out of the laser. Lasing with an intracavity
power of 3 kW therefore reduces the power output by around 25%. When the laser was operated
at 200 W (where the spectrum is narrow) it could be turned on and off very repeatably. When
operated at 300 W the cavity length had to be adjusted to reestablish lasing. CW lasing was quite
stable and no degradation in performance was seen over a couple of hours of operation. In fact the
laser seems to operate better as the cathode degrades, as long as the bunch charge can still be
produced.
Yesterday's day shift was spent toward improving the match of the recirculated electron beam.
Yesterday evening we were preparing to do another run of cw lasing straight ahead to try out some
ideas for improving the cw laser power and also to measure the loss in the optical transport line.
Unfortunately, the gun arced twice, and later a third time, polluting the cathode and severely
degrading its quantum efficiency. We still did some lasing at 10 pC bunch charge, but could not
carry out our plans for the evening. This morning, the maximum bunch charge that could be
extracted was only 5 pC. The gun had to be operated all week at voltages in the range 324-330 kV
because field emission was problematic at the nominal 350 kV. It also needed daily recesiation.
Nonetheless, we achieved the successes described above.
Detailed plans for the next two weeks were developed. We will use the weekend to try to bring the
gun back online. Next, we will work further to improve the match of the recirculated beam, then
set up both the beam-loss monitors in the recirculation loop and the energy-recovery dump to
permit cw recirculation, then do cw recirculation with energy recovery, and then lase cw with
energy recovery with an average electron current of at least 2.2 mA. If all goes well, and if we can
get the necessary Laser Safety System and Laser Safety Operating Procedure fully completed, we
may also be able to squeeze in a user experiment in Lab 1 (that being prepared by M. Shinn and
Old Dominion University). We will accomplish all we sensibly can prior to the FEL Conference,
which will start here in Williamsburg on 16 Aug 98 and end on 22 Aug 98. The FEL will be open
(no running) during the Conference.
|
|