Privacy and Security Notice

Archived Messages for CLAS_GSIM@cebaf.gov: Re: NOSEC "ALL" and NOSEC "(all components)" & NOGEOM

Re: NOSEC "ALL" and NOSEC "(all components)" & NOGEOM

JianGuo Zhao (JZHAO@mitlns.mit.edu)
Wed, 25 Mar 1998 15:03:38 -0500 (EST)

Yes, are these our next step?
We are trying to find out where most CPU time spent and how they affect our
ultimate goal.
Jianguo

>I want to remind you though that some of these components will directly
>influence what the results of the calculations looks like. In the case of
>NOGEOM, we'd get particles where they should not be. In the case of NOSEC,
>we loose noise that may affect the acceptance also.
>>We would have to increase the accuracy of these 'speed tests' to get
>anything meaningful out. We should have some estimate on how turning any of
>these parts affects the ACCEPTANCE we are trying to ultimately calculate.
>That's the hard part.