Privacy and Security Notice

Archived Messages for CLAS_GSIM@cebaf.gov: Re: NOSEC "ALL" and NOSEC "(all components)" & NOGEOM

Re: NOSEC "ALL" and NOSEC "(all components)" & NOGEOM

Will Brooks (brooksw@jlab.org)
Wed, 25 Mar 1998 20:37:36 +0000

Hi,

Based on Jianguo's results and Maurik's comments, it looks like we're spending
80% of our time generating secondaries in volumes which are not the active
detector components. Sounds like it's worth looking into the details.

3. NOSEC 'ALL' 0:56/100 events
4. NOSEC 'MINI' 'TORU' 'EC' 'EC1' 'DC' 'FOIL' 'SC' 'CC' 5:20/100 events

(1 - 0:56/5:20 = 78%)

The line below, from Jianguo's later message, does not seem to be compatible
with the above.
Shouldn't the time spent in 'OTHE' be roughly 5:20 minus 0:56, or 4:24, instead
of 2:50?

NOSEC 'OTHE' 2:50/per 100 events

What am I missing?

- Will