I've looked at a recent run (#6079) with my offline scalers
program and can confrim what you report. Here is a dump of
the output (I've highlighted the channels to which you refer):
Simon.
-------------------------------------------------------------
TOF Scaler Summary for run 6079:
SECTOR:
Scaler 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 4.92465 4.59582 4.95247 3.95446 2.93087 5.76574
2 8.58660 7.29625 8.32611 8.86200 5.52633 12.08482
3 * 35.26550 10.50429 10.44449 8.94093 7.40918 13.14682
4 * 53.87623 11.04959 10.94596 8.19838 7.91111 8.67624
5 * 45.28863 10.99668 9.29202 13.92288 8.05286 8.54587
6 * 27.67212 11.90310 7.80615 14.73846 7.90066 7.51075
7 10.23778 10.98482 8.44439 8.81692 6.90479 8.64484
8 11.40812 10.20024 9.58749 5.72019 5.05368 10.21317
9 17.53159 9.64865 8.21549 8.70965 5.34242 8.74483
10 17.25306 10.52019 8.98749 12.00110 6.49414 6.93874
11 8.95180 9.56301 8.17867 9.06582 5.94672 6.35051
12 8.36477 7.98565 6.43005 6.75202 5.95386 6.85797
13 11.75003 14.37920 5.78998 4.76928 5.94656 7.11363
14 10.07631 13.74415 4.97785 7.19159 5.36913 5.54638
15 4.91486 6.54337 8.07578 9.04280 5.29483 4.87573
16 10.84229 5.22110 6.64950 5.34164 3.62287 3.70657
17 15.29407 * 2794.22949 11.04635 9.07813 5.71084 7.14215
18 7.47201 * 1520.94653 6.66191 6.22515 5.61390 12.16930
19 4.94673 * 160.23416 6.19374 4.19800 4.48002 5.37350
20 1.42204 * 3560.58398 5.96949 1.74681 3.19997 4.13354
21 1.35566 * 43.73203 3.65175 0.90239 5.40127 4.04109
22 4.49661 * 98.77819 6.60403 3.51055 4.39942 4.58720
23 4.11781 * 580.14832 13.70615 4.44622 4.16906 4.82482
24 1.30124 * 946.93732 10.93448 0.69261 2.76670 3.12836
25 2.66396 3.63072 4.19713 2.52421 1.63757 2.88574
26 2.18038 2.72628 3.18694 2.65431 1.81347 2.96155
27 1.02556 3.63072 2.92005 1.27555 4.78240 4.27263
28 0.76581 2.72628 3.25952 1.12231 5.93419 4.04051
29 0.41775 0.00000 1.62136 0.32396 2.78266 1.13419
30 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.74094 0.95793
31 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.14219 0.92419
32 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.44194 1.18510