I want to move recsis to version 2.0 but Freyberger will not allow me to
do this (yet he keeps complaining that I should rotate the test libs into
the production area).
Since I can't get any help from the developers I'll do things myself! On
Sunday april 28'th I will lock all of recsis and increase the version
number to 2.0. If during this process I find any files locked or have any
trouble getting locks on files I'll break all locks and resolve all
problems then. If this "breaks" your codes tough! I will not listen to
arne complain that the production link libs need to be updated again.
Again, on Sunday April 28'th I'll lock all of recsis and promote the
source code upto version 2.0. You'll want to have released all locks and
checked any code in that should be in version 2.0.
JAM
On Tue, 23 Apr 1996 BROOKSW@CEBAF.GOV wrote:
> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 1996 11:58:47 -0500 (EST)
> From: BROOKSW@CEBAF.GOV
> To: egn_calcom@CEBAF.GOV, muguira@clas01, freyberg@cebaf9.cebaf.gov
> Subject: checking files out locked
>
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I have checked in a version of the reconstruction code
> >> which worked for me. I had parts of it checked out
> >> locked. I will verify that it still works. This includes
> >> the position reconstruction missing in the earlier
> >> code.
> >>
> >> If anyone checks out code to work on it, please
> >> always check it out locked and don't keep it out
> >> too long. Thanks!
> >>
> >> - Will
> >>
> > Hi,
> > Are you sure about that? There is no code checked in by you,(Apr 23)
> > except ec_output.F, the change of that code is AUTHOR.
> > I can't checked out anythiong and locked it, since everything
> > is locked by muguira.
> > --
> > T.-Y
>
> Hello,
>
> I issued the command to check in the code while Jay was present,
> so I'm sure the command was correct. I don't know why nothing
> got checked in. Jay says he is right in the middle of doing something
> for Arne, and that's why the code is locked by him. Any ideas
> on this?
>
> - Will
>
>