Re: More detail on the relative size of packages ...

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Arne Freyberger: "Re: bad_cc.evt"
• Previous message: Arne Freyberger: "Re: More detail on the relative size of packages ..."
• Maybe in reply to: James Muguira: "More detail on the relative size of packages ..."
• Next in thread: STEPANYAN@CEBAF.GOV: "Re: More detail on the relative size of packages ..."

About libtrk.a[trk_dcgeom.o], this fill has the wire position for the
6 sectors (taking into account misalignment and misorientation of each
of the 18 chambers)... and I don't think that this routine grown again.
This routine replace sda_dcgeom.F ... trk_dcgeom.o have to be discarded
from libtrk.a.

If you realy want to test the space memory used by recsis, I have to
clean the TRK/S1 subdirectory wich containes a lot of unused routines.

Francois.
--
Francois Roudot : Roudot@cebaf.gov
CEBAF : 12000 Jefferson Avenue Home : 1634 E. OceanView Ave. #3D
Newport News VA-23606 Norfolk VA-23503
Off. (757) 269-7680 Pho. (757) 587-4855
Fax. (757) 269-6273

• Next message: Arne Freyberger: "Re: bad_cc.evt"
• Previous message: Arne Freyberger: "Re: More detail on the relative size of packages ..."
• Maybe in reply to: James Muguira: "More detail on the relative size of packages ..."
• Next in thread: STEPANYAN@CEBAF.GOV: "Re: More detail on the relative size of packages ..."