Privacy and Security Notice

Sept 30, 2005 meeting minutes


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Sept 30, 2005 meeting minutes




Weekly meeting minutes - September 30, 2005

Present: M. Wood, M. Ito, E. Clinton, V. Mochalov,
         Y. Prok, K. Hardy, D. McNulty, L. Benton,
         A. Teymurazyan
On the phone: L. Gan, R. Miskimen, A. Bernstein

Secretary: Yelena Prok ( Mike Wood will be next secretary)

1. Review of last meeting minutes:
  Discussed the recent developments in tagger calibrations by Dave
Lawrence. Dave has produced new calibration constants which align tagger 
timing signal with respect to the timing signals from TAC, PS paddle #5,
or HYCAL total sum (bit 9). Some histograms from this investigation 
can be found at  
http://www.jlab.org/~davidl/PrimEx/Presentations/2005_09_29_tagger_calib/
In summary, using TAC and PS paddle #5 produce consistent results, with 
little variation in time (from run to run), which is not the case when 
bit 9 is used as a timing stop. Pair Spectrometer will be used to 
produce calibration constants for the production runs.  
  Dave also volunteered to create a new bank which would hold a list of 
photon candidates for the event, based on the time difference between 
tagger time and HYCAL total sum.

2. Status of HYCAL reconstruction 
  Vasily Mochalov discussed the status of HYCAL reconstruction which is 
very nicely summarized in 
http://www.jlab.org/~mochalov/hycal_software/primex_meetings/2005-September-30.html  
Some important highlights of this discussion:

  1. What to do about the changing sparcification cuts during the run? 
  2. Knowledge of the distance from HYCAL to the target cannot be 
     extracted from the physics processes, as it becomes very sensitive 
     to the gain constants. NEED TO FIX THE DISTANCE BEFORE ENERGY
     CALIBRATIONS USING PHYSICS PROCESSES CAN PROCEED. 
  3. Also important to know the beam position on HYCAL. Who will 
     analyze the L. Gan's photon beam profiler data to extract the 
     actual beam coordinates?


3. Veto Analysis of pi0 Events from Pb Target  
  Mike Wood showed some invariant mass distributions from pairs of
clusters using Pb target runs (no cuts of any kind were made, z=730 cm).
The slides can be accessed from the weekly meeting page, 
/group/primex/html/weekly_meetings/slides_2005_09_30/mhw_30sep2005/
There are 4 distributions on each histogram:
 black: no VETO cut 
 red: both clusters neutral 
 green: both clusters charged
 blue: one charged, one neutral
There is a large peak at ~200 MeV, in the case of both clusters 
being charged. Also, events with more than 3 clusters do not show 
any significant enhancement around pi0 mass.


4. Some organizational issues:
  1. Not everyone has been able to join the meetings by phone. If 
someone would like to change the time of the meeting, please let 
Mark Ito know by email. 

  2. Any thoughts on the time of the next collaboration meeting?