\relax 
\citation{Hoyer:1997iw}
\citation{Brodsky:1992dj}
\citation{Brodsky:2000zc}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3.5}Charm Production near Threshold}{120}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.5.1}General motivations}{120}}
\newlabel{sec:charmmotiv}{{3.5.1}{120}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.50}{\ignorespaces The characteristic time scales in $J/\psi $ production on proton.}}{120}}
\newlabel{fig:time}{{3.50}{120}}
\citation{Berger:1979du}
\citation{Camerini:1975cy}
\citation{Gittelman:1975ix}
\citation{Camerini:1975cy}
\citation{Gittelman:1975ix}
\citation{Anderson:1976sd}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.51}{\ignorespaces Variation of the cross sections of J/$\psi $ photoproduction near threshold, for two or three gluon exchange mechanisms. The inverted triangles show the expected accuracy at CEBAF at 11\nobreakspace  {}GeV beam.}}{121}}
\newlabel{fig:expresstan}{{3.51}{121}}
\citation{Laget:1995ba}
\citation{Laget:1995ba}
\citation{Luke:1992tm}
\citation{Brodsky:1997gh}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.52}{\ignorespaces  The simplest diagram to reveal hidden color state in deuterium\nobreakspace  {}\cite  {Laget:1995ba}.}}{122}}
\newlabel{hidden_col}{{3.52}{122}}
\citation{Kharzeev:1999bz}
\citation{Anderson:1977hi}
\citation{Gerschel:1992uh}
\citation{Hufner:1998jg}
\citation{Chudakov:2001li}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.5.2}Experimental program}{123}}
\newlabel{sec:charmexper}{{3.5.2}{123}}
\citation{Anderson:1977hi}
\citation{Anderson:1977hi}
\citation{Gottfried:1969aa}
\citation{Laget:1972aa}
\citation{Anderson:1977hi}
\citation{Anderson:1977hi}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {3.12}{\ignorespaces Experimental resolutions of the possible charm experiments at JLab}}{124}}
\newlabel{tab:resolut}{{3.12}{124}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {3.13}{\ignorespaces Comparison of the experimental options to study charm at JLab. The background to signal ratio was estimated for 11\nobreakspace  {}GeV photons. The last column shows the number of days of data taking needed to achieve an average relative statistical accuracy of the cross-section measurement of 10\%, in an energy range of 0.4\nobreakspace  {}GeV above the threshold. This estimate has not been done for open charm since the background is at the moment uncertain. }}{124}}
\newlabel{tab:options}{{3.13}{124}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {3.14}{\ignorespaces The expected yields of MAD+HRS setup per day on nuclear targets 7.7\% radiation length thick, and from a 15\nobreakspace  {}cm liquid hydrogen target}}{125}}
\newlabel{tab:stanadep}{{3.14}{125}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {3.15}{\ignorespaces The values of nuclear transparencies for \ensuremath  {\@mathrm {J /\psi (1S)}}{}, calculated in the model used by the SLAC measurement\cite  {Anderson:1977hi}, for 3 values of $\sigma {}_{\psi {}N}${}. The last column presents the expected statistical error for a $\sigma {}_{\psi {}N}${} measurement, assuming a statistical error of 3\% for the yields on every target.}}{125}}
\newlabel{tab:nuclabs}{{3.15}{125}}
\@setckpt{Sections/physics-charm-all}{
\setcounter{page}{126}
\setcounter{equation}{46}
\setcounter{enumi}{0}
\setcounter{enumii}{0}
\setcounter{enumiii}{0}
\setcounter{enumiv}{0}
\setcounter{footnote}{0}
\setcounter{mpfootnote}{0}
\setcounter{part}{0}
\setcounter{chapter}{3}
\setcounter{section}{5}
\setcounter{subsection}{2}
\setcounter{subsubsection}{0}
\setcounter{paragraph}{0}
\setcounter{subparagraph}{0}
\setcounter{figure}{52}
\setcounter{table}{15}
}