\relax 
\citation{FeynClose}
\citation{Frankfurt}
\citation{Le91}
\citation{Ch99}
\citation{JaffeJi}
\citation{Am91}
\citation{Ba94a}
\citation{Ac98}
\citation{Ha98}
\citation{Sp98}
\citation{Th83}
\citation{Th00}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3.2}Semi-inclusive processes}{44}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2.1}Introduction}{44}}
\newlabel{eq:factorize}{{3.16}{44}}
\citation{Ha98}
\citation{Pe98}
\citation{Me99}
\citation{Al00}
\citation{Fi77}
\citation{Sc91}
\citation{Me99}
\citation{Fr98}
\citation{Bo99}
\citation{Ca01}
\citation{Di97}
\citation{Gl00}
\citation{St02}
\citation{HERMES02}
\citation{Do77}
\citation{Ro79}
\citation{St97}
\citation{Co89}
\citation{Ba83}
\citation{Le00}
\citation{Co89}
\citation{Be79}
\citation{Cl73}
\citation{Ca75}
\citation{Is99}
\citation{As88}
\citation{HERMES02}
\citation{Si87}
\citation{Ji95}
\citation{Br96}
\citation{Me97}
\citation{Ao97}
\citation{Co93}
\citation{Ac98}
\citation{En00}
\citation{CLAS_SSA}
\citation{Afanasev00}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.9}{\ignorespaces Accessible kinematic region for an $(e,e^{\prime } h)$ measurement at 11 GeV.}}{48}}
\newlabel{fig:xjiang1}{{3.9}{48}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2.2}Experimental demonstration of factorization}{48}}
\newlabel{eq:fragp}{{3.17}{49}}
\newlabel{eq:fragm}{{3.18}{49}}
\citation{Le91}
\citation{Ac98}
\citation{Ha98}
\citation{Me99}
\citation{Le91}
\citation{Me99}
\citation{Al00}
\citation{Ha98}
\citation{e906}
\citation{Ha98}
\citation{e906}
\citation{Ingleman}
\citation{Lai}
\citation{Sjostrand}
\citation{e906}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2.3}Probing the light quark sea flavor asymmetry with semi-inclusive charged pion production}{50}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.10}{\ignorespaces The projected precision of $\mathaccent "7016\relax {d}/\mathaccent "7016\relax {u}$ extractions at Hall A with an 11 GeV incident electron beam. The published measurement of E866\nobreakspace  {}\cite  {Ha98} as well as the E906 projection are plotted for comparison\nobreakspace  {}\cite  {e906}. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.}}{51}}
\newlabel{fig:jlabproj}{{3.10}{51}}
\citation{HermesSpin}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2.4}Probing the quark flavor structure of the nucleon spin distribution from $\mathaccent "017E\relax {N}(\mathaccent "017E\relax {e},e^{\prime } \pi ^\pm )$ process}{52}}
\newlabel{eq:a1h}{{3.27}{52}}
\citation{HermesSpin}
\citation{HermesSpin}
\citation{Le00}
\citation{Su98}
\citation{Be79}
\citation{Co89}
\citation{shigetani}
\citation{davidson}
\citation{hecht}
\citation{best}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2.5}The pion structure function}{53}}
\citation{dyw}
\citation{Me02}
\citation{Co89}
\citation{hecht}
\citation{Co89}
\citation{hecht}
\citation{Su72}
\citation{bunce00}
\citation{Co93}
\citation{efremov99}
\citation{hermes00a}
\citation{hermes01}
\citation{Oganessian98}
\citation{DeSanctis00}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2.6}Transversity measurements}{55}}
\newlabel{Eq:trans1}{{3.28}{55}}
\newlabel{Eq:ssa1}{{3.29}{55}}
\citation{smc99}
\citation{korotkov01}
\citation{hermes01}
\citation{hermes01}
\citation{korotkov01}
\citation{hermes00a}
\citation{hermes01}
\citation{Oganessian98}
\citation{DeSanctis00}
\citation{hermes00a}
\citation{hermes01}
\citation{Oganessian98}
\citation{DeSanctis00}
\citation{aubert85}
\newlabel{Eq:ssa2}{{3.30}{57}}
\newlabel{Eq:ssa3}{{3.31}{57}}
\newlabel{Eq:ssa4}{{3.32}{57}}
\newlabel{Eq:ssa5}{{3.33}{57}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.11}{\ignorespaces Expected semi-inclusive asymmetry measurements with polarized NH$_3$ and $^3$He targets. 1000 hours of beam time is assumed for each target. Error bars are statistical only.}}{59}}
\newlabel{fig:xjiang2}{{3.11}{59}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.12}{\ignorespaces Expected results on ${{\begingroup \Delta \mathaccent "7016\relax {q}\endgroup \over \mathaccent "7016\relax {q}}}$ from semi-inclusive asymmetry measurements with polarized NH$_3$ and $^3$He targets. 1000 hours of beam time is assumed for each target. Error bars are statistical only.}}{60}}
\newlabel{fig:xjiang3}{{3.12}{60}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.13}{\ignorespaces Existing data for the pion structure function from Drell-Yan scattering \cite {Co89}. The solid curve represents a calculation of Hecht {\it  et al.}\nobreakspace  {}\cite {hecht}, which is typical of treatments that describe the pion as a non pointlike bound state. There is a marked disagreement between the calculation and data at high $x_{Bj}$. }}{61}}
\newlabel{pion_fig1}{{3.13}{61}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.14}{\ignorespaces The Sullivan process: Deep inelastic scattering from the pion cloud surrounding a proton.}}{61}}
\newlabel{pion_fig2}{{3.14}{61}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.15}{\ignorespaces Simulated data for the pion structure function at two different Q$^{2}$ points (1.5, and 3.0 (GeV/c)$^{2}$) using MAD spectrometer in coincidence with a low energy neutron detector at 11 GeV beam in Hall A.}}{62}}
\newlabel{pion_fig3}{{3.15}{62}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.16}{\ignorespaces Simulated MAD kinematics at 15$^{\circ }$. Top left gives the central angle for MAD and the neutron detector, top right gives the neutron momentum range accessed, bottom left gives the electron momentum range covered, and the bottom right gives the $Q^{2}$ range covered.}}{63}}
\newlabel{pion_fig4}{{3.16}{63}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.17}{\ignorespaces Simulated MAD kinematics at 22$^{0}$. Top left gives the central angle for MAD and the neutron detector, top right gives the neutron momentum range accessed, bottom left gives the electron momentum range covered, and the bottom right gives the $Q^{2}$ range covered.}}{64}}
\newlabel{pion_fig5}{{3.17}{64}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.18}{\ignorespaces Analyzing power in the $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits \phi $ moment from HERMES {\cite {hermes00a,hermes01}}. Error bars include the statistical uncertainty only. The filled and open bands at the bottom of the panels represent the systematic uncertainties for neutral and charged pions, respectively. The shaded areas show a range of predictions of a model calculation applied to the case of $\pi ^\circ $ electro-production {\cite {Oganessian98,DeSanctis00}}.}}{65}}
\newlabel{fig:trans_fig1}{{3.18}{65}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.19}{\ignorespaces Kinematics plots for $(e, e^\prime )$ scattering using 11 GeV electron beam. The solid, dashed, and dotted curves correspond to electron scattering angle at $12.5^\circ , 25.0^\circ ,$ and $37.5^\circ $, respectively. $E^\prime $ is the energy of the scattered electron and $\theta ^\prime $ is the laboratory angle of the virtual photon.}}{66}}
\newlabel{fig:trans_fig2}{{3.19}{66}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.20}{\ignorespaces The expected precisions in transverse single-spin asymmetry measurements on a polarized $^{15}$NH$_{3}$ and a polarized $^3$He target, for the kinematics of $x_{Bj}=0.2$ and $x_{Bj}=0.3$. 1000 hours of beam time is assumed for each target.}}{67}}
\newlabel{fig:trans_fig3}{{3.20}{67}}
\@setckpt{Sections/physics-semi-all}{
\setcounter{page}{68}
\setcounter{equation}{33}
\setcounter{enumi}{0}
\setcounter{enumii}{0}
\setcounter{enumiii}{0}
\setcounter{enumiv}{0}
\setcounter{footnote}{0}
\setcounter{mpfootnote}{0}
\setcounter{part}{0}
\setcounter{chapter}{3}
\setcounter{section}{2}
\setcounter{subsection}{6}
\setcounter{subsubsection}{0}
\setcounter{paragraph}{0}
\setcounter{subparagraph}{0}
\setcounter{figure}{20}
\setcounter{table}{5}
}