|
|
TITLE: |
||
|
|
|||
|
DOCUMENT ID: |
3120 Appendix F The Experiment Review Process: Hall Startup or Early
Commissioning of Major New Apparatus |
||
|
|
|||
1.0
Purpose

1.1
Initial Equipment Review
1.1.1
Develop list of equipment
to be used for the initial experiment
1.1.2
Identify Environmental,
Safety, Health, and Quality (ESH&Q) Issues associated with the initial
complement of equipment and with the Safety Envelope for beam operation in the
hall.
1.1.3
Determine the Experiment
Operating Envelope (EOE) for all combinations of beam conditions and
target(s) planned. Identify safety
issues for EOE
and incorporate mitigating measures as necessary into the detailed design of
the equipment. The anticipated run
conditions must be brought to the attention of the Radiation Control Group (RadCon)
for their review. Decommissioning plans
for target and activated components must also be developed if appropriate. Address the issues normally covered in a Radiation Safety
Assessment Document (RSAD) as part of the planning for the commissioning
activities, and complete calculations of the EOE and
address the ESH&Q issues it raises. (This
information may be included either in the TOSP document
or in a separate document referenced in the TOSP.)
1.1.4
Complete a safety analysis
of the equipment to be commissioned and of the commissioning activities to be
carried out under the TOSP. The TOSP must
explicitly reference (or include) an RSAD (see 1.1.3
above) or address radiation issues among the hazards identified and discussed.
1.1.5
Document the equipment and
incorporate into the TOSP written
operations procedures
appropriate for its commissioning.
(For startup, initial procedures
may permit equipment operation and modification or maintenance work only by
those who designed and built it, or individuals who have been explicitly trained
and certified by the designers and builders as having adequate knowledge and
skills to work on the equipment; this temporarily avoids the issue of detailed
training and operations procedure
documentation).
1.1.6
Physics Division review of
the TOSP
(following the Division’s standard TOSP review procedures)
and review of the RSAD (or the radiation
safety-related portion of the TOSP) by
Jefferson Lab is RadCon
Group.
(These reviews will generate the basic Experiment Installation
Checklist, or EIC, identifying items to be checked at installation prior to
approval of the commissioning activity TOSP for beam
delivery. A sample EIC is provided in ES&H Manual Chapter 3120 Appendix H Checklists
for Experiment Preparation. Issues
or concerns raised during the course of these or
subsequent reviews will be entered onto the experiment’s Issue/Concern
Checklist, or ICC, and must be addressed before commissioning can begin. A sample ICC is provided in ES&H Manual Chapter 3120 Appendix H Checklists
for Experiment Preparation.)
1.1.7
Additional review
of the RSAD
(or radiation-related portion of the TOSP) by the Jefferson
Lab Radiation Review Panel (JRRP) or an appropriate ad hoc panel as deemed
necessary by the RadCon
Officer.
(This review may generate
additional items for the EIC and/or ICC.)
1.2
Preparation for Mounting the Commissioning
Activities
1.2.1
Describe Experiment Procedures,
Collaboration Organization, Training Required, etc. in
a written Conduct of Operations Document (COO) that is either a separate
document or a part of the TOSP.
1.2.2
Review and approval of the COO by Jefferson Lab’s Technical
Advisory Committee (TAC) as part of the TOSP review.
1.2.3
Complete installation of equipment in experimental area
1.2.4
Install target and any equipment necessary to ensure operation
within the approved safety envelope
1.2.5
Pre-operation checkout of equipment installation and procedures
by experiment collaboration. This serves
to verify operability after installation and to review integration to the
extent possible without the use of beam.
1.2.6
TOSP
approved by the Division Safety Officer.
(This will follow standard division procedures
for review of any TOSP, and
include verification that all issues and concerns have been satisfactorily
resolved, as detailed in the Issue/Concern Checklist.)
1.3
Commission equipment (following written procedures
documented in COO or the COO portion of the TOSP)
(Use commissioning and initial running activities to help complete
the development and expansion of operating procedures
- consider the accelerator division’s approach of having a “trainee” follow an
expert on his rounds, keeping detailed records and converting them to written procedures
that the expert can review.)
1.4
Review the experience obtained during the commissioning activities
and:
1.4.1
Update and expand the Equipment Safety
Assessment Document (ESAD) portion of the TOSP for the
equipment (providing an initial ESAD for the base equipment for the first
experiment).
1.4.2
Update written procedures
for equipment use (resulting in an (resulting in an initial Operating Manual
for use of the base equipment in the initial experiment).
1.4.3
Update the COO document (resulting in a COO for the first
experiment).
|
|
ISSUING
AUTHORITY |
APPENDIX
AUTHOR |
APPROVAL
DATE |
EFFECTIVE
DATE |
EXPIRATION
DATE |
REV. |
|
|
|
|
ESH&Q Division |
02/14/09 |
02/14/09 |
02/14/09 |
0 |
|