TITLE

ES&H Manual

 

DOCUMENT ID

6110 Appendix T2:

Special Lockout/Tagout Procedures

 

1.0           Purpose

In accordance with Jefferson Lab procedures (ES&H Manual Chapter 6110 Appendix T1 Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) Procedure and ES&H Manual Chapter 6111 Administrative Control Using Locks and Tags), a lock and/or tag is removed only by the original qualified Tagger who placed it on the equipment, or an authorized person in the administrative control scenario. Only when the original qualified Tagger is not physically on-site, or the information is missing or illegible, is this special removal procedure to be utilized.

 

This appendix describes:

 

                    1.1             Produces for removing an LOTO when the original person is unavailable.

                    1.2             Procedures for lockon and tagon in accordance with ES&H Manual Chapter 6111 Administrative Control Using Locks and Tags.

                    1.3             Procedures for LOTO in Confined Spaces can be referenced in this appendix in accordance with ES&H Manual Chapter 6160 Confined Space Program.

                    1.4             Procedures for an LOTO for testing purposes, simple and complex.

                    1.5             Procedures LOTOs for non-electrical equipment is found in this appendix. To isolate energy hazards, refer to equipment specific manuals for procedures and division documentation.

2.0           Scope

These procedures are used for removing a lock (maintenance or administrative) and/or a tag (maintenance or administrative) when the owner is not physically on-site, or the information is missing or illegible. These procedures also address situations in confined spaces, tagon/lockon, and non-electrical equipment isolations.

3.0           Responsibilities

Note:   Management authority may be delegated to a task-qualified TJNAF employee at the discretion of the responsible manager.

3.1            Employees at Jefferson Lab

 

3.1.1       Recognize and respect LOTO measures.

3.1.2       Do not remove any lock or tag except those meeting the exceptions outlined within this appendix.

4.0           Process Steps for Special Removal of Tags/Locks When the Original Person is Unavailable

Unless otherwise stated, a qualified worker at Jefferson Lab may perform the process steps listed below with Supervisor approval:

 

Step 1:     Attempt to Locate the Original Qualified Tagger

 

a.                Verify that the original qualified Tagger, if known, is physically not on-site. Make a determined effort to locate the individual by email, telephone, and pager. 

 

NOTE:  In the case that an email, telephone, or page from the original qualified tagger is not returned in a timely manner, then there would need to be consideration for an authorization for removal of a lock and/or tag. The “Special Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) Removal Form” must be completed (see ES&H Manual Chapter 6110 Appendix T5 Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) Forms)

 

Step 2:     Walk-through

 

a.                Conduct a walk-through inspection of the system and surrounding area to ensure no one is at risk from restoration of energy.

b.               Inform all affected individuals of the pending lock/tag removal.

 

Step 3:     Affirm Management Agreement

 

a.                Complete the “Special Lock and Tag Removal” form in the ES&H Manual Chapter 6110 Appendix T5 Special Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) Forms. 

b.               Obtain approval signature from:

1.               One of the following:

 

                 Your work group supervisor

 

OR

 

                 Your department manager 

 

AND

 

2.               One of the following (see NOTE below):

 

                 The original qualified Tagger’s supervisor,

 

OR

 

                 The original qualified Tagger’s department manager,

 

OR

 

                 The owner or primary manager of the affected equipment.

 

 

NOTE: A verbal approval signature (i.e. an email or telephone conversation) is acceptable in critical situations when the approval signature person is away from the laboratory. The conversation must be documented in the corresponding approval signature block, stating when and with whom this conversation took place, or by attachment of a copy of the e-mail. A verbal signature from the original qualified tagger does NOT negate this special lock and tag removal procedure.

 


 

Post the Form

 

a.                Display a copy of the completed form on, or closely adjacent to, the equipment

 

AND

 

b.               Display a copy of the completed form on, or closely adjacent to, the area where the lock/tag was removed (if different than above).

 

NOTE:  The form(s) must remain in-place until the original qualified Tagger removes it, or all reasonable efforts to identify and/or locate the lock/tag owner have been exhausted; then the equipment owner, with concurrence from the original qualified Tagger’s supervisor (if known), may remove it.

 

 

 

 

 

Step 4:     Remove the Lock and Tag

 

a.                Remove the device(s). Exercise caution so as not to damage the components they are attached to. Do not use any tool besides appropriately sized bolt cutters to cut a lock.

 

Step 5:     Final Communication

 

a.                Immediately – Ensure the original qualified Tagger’s supervisor is notified when removal is complete. 

b.               Upon return – The original qualified Tagger’s supervisor notifies the original qualified Tagger of the change in status.

 

 

5.0           Temporarily Removing an LOTO for Testing

                      5.1          During work, if workers must temporarily remove LOTO devices to test equipment (mode 2 work for electrical), they must follow these steps:

 

                                        Step 1:                    Qualified Electrical Worker (QEW) (if the testing involves electricity)

 

a.                Fills out the Special Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) Removal Form if a worker will be exposed to 50V or greater.

 

                                        Step 2:                    The Qualified Worker will clear the equipment, machine, or system of tools and materials.

                                        Step 3:                    The Qualified Worker will have affected employees leave the immediate area of the equipment, machine, or system.

 

 

                                        Step 4:                    All Qualified Workers who applied an LOTO will remove their locks and tags.

 

                                        Step 5:                    The Qualified Worker will energize and proceed with conducting their test.

 

                                        Step 6:                    Person in Charge (PIC), supervisor, or Qualified Worker when testing is done will

 

a.                Decide what work needs to be done

b.               If it is a complex LOTO, then you will need a different LOTO. Proceed to Step 9.

 

                                        Step 7:                    When Testing is complete, the Qualified Worker will:

 

a.                Implement all steps of the appropriate LOTO procedure.

b.               Make sure all equipment is back in a safe working condition

 

                                        Step 8:                    The Qualified Worker will continue the maintenance work and end the procedure.

                                        Step 9:                    (Complex LOTO) The PIC, supervisor, or Qualified Worker will:

 

a.                Decide if the currently install LOTO on isolations devices can remain in place.

b.               Review, revise, and have approval before performing the complex LOTO procedure. When the complex LOTO is revised, proceed with the requirements of your department or your division’s procedure for document control and submit for approval. If it is not approved, go to Step 10. If it is approved, go to Step 11.

 

                                     Step 10:                    The PIC, supervisor, or the Qualified Worker will:

 

a.                Determine which LOTO isolation devices must remain in their current position.

b.               Install administrative locks and tags on the applicable devices according to section 10.4, and direct that no one may manipulate the isolation devices without prior authorization.

c.                Clear the complex LOTO according to the current procedure.

d.               Revise the procedure according to requirements of your department or your division’s procedures for document control.

e.                Submit the procedure for approval according to your division’s work planning and control process.

 

                                     Step 11:                    The person who will approve the complex LOTO will:

 

a.                Approve the revised procedure

 

OR

 

b.               Work with the PIC until the procedure is ready for approval.

 

                                     Step 12:                    After the revision has been approved, the Qualified Worker will:

a.                Perform the applicable authorized work for a complex LOTO again

b.               Follow the revised procedure for LOTO.

 

                                     Step 13:                    The Qualified Worker will remove any administrative LOTOs that were installed while waiting for the revised procedure.

6.0           Lockon and Tagon

6.1            Lockon or tagon means applying an administrative lock and or tag (ES&H Manual Chapter 6111 Administrative Control Using Locks and Tags) to confirm service remains available. 

 

6.2            The energy sources in Jefferson Lab that may need lockon and/or tagon are primarily electrical circuits that directly affect staff safety (critical loads) or protect property (essential loads). The following list provides examples of each: 

 

6.2.1       Critical loads: fire alarm and life safety systems, fire pumps, exit or night lighting, certain telephone equipment, radiation monitoring devices, and similar applications

6.2.2       Essential loads: sump pumps, certain heating controls and devices, control power to most alarm circuits for the central security system not characterized as critical, certain computer circuits, certain experimental circuits, and other applications that might cause injury or property loss if deenergized. 

 

6.3            Jefferson Lab prefers lockon or tagon for essential and critical circuits, but you may use tagon alone if it is not feasible to lock on the circuit control device.

6.4            Obtain approval from division management before locking and/or tagging on circuits. The division ESH coordinator or safety coordinator must maintain a log that lists the following and it MUST be approved by the AHJ: 

                 All circuits locked or tagged on

                 Dates

                 Reason for the lockon/tagon

 

6.5            Tags must indicate the follow:

                 Reason the circuit is locked and/or tagged on

                 Date the lock and/or tag was applied

                 Who retains the key

 

6.6            Jefferson Lab recommends that the equipment owner or the person applying the administrative lock and tag conducts an annual audit of sources locked and tagged on.

7.0           LOTO in Confined Spaces

For work located in a confined space that requires LOTO, ES&H Manual Chapter 6160 Confined Space Program , requires a minimum of two isolation methods (per hazard type) to control fluid, gas, mechanical, and steam. 

 

7.1            Before disconnecting fluid, gas, or steam lines, isolate the lines by a minimum of two methods upstream combined with a method to bleed and isolate the downstream. In mechanical systems (for example, tank mixers), lock out the drive power source and disconnect the linkage between the drive and the power transmission shaft. 

7.2             

If the system is in total shutdown (hazardous energy sources were removed and all lines leading to the confined space were vented), it does not need isolation. Likewise, the system does not require isolation if all of the following are true: the liquid is not a hazard when not under pressure, the source of pressure is locked out, and pressure in the lines is reduced to a safe level. To determine if the liquid is a hazard under pressure, see Table 10-1. 

 

  

 

7.3            If toxic materials or toxic, flammable, or inert gas systems are present in a confined space, workers may need a Confined Space Entry Permit. Locking out and venting the systems before line breakage in the space may not be adequate to remove the hazard. Workers may need to flush the system to remove the hazardous chemicals before opening the system in the space. Failure to properly flush and vent may result in serious illness or death. For more information on working in confined space to flush or vent systems, refer to ES&H Manual Chapter 6160 Confined Space Program.

8.0            Using Trapped-Key Interlock Systems

8.1            Trapped-key interlocks (also known as a Kirk key or sequestered key) use locking mechanisms and keys to sequentially control equipment for safe operation. A safe sequence of operations occurs by transferring trapped or released keys in a predetermined order. Some interlocks include a time delay or a rotation detector so that a machine has time to come to a stop before the next step of an interlock sequence proceeds. 

 

8.2            The following list explains the requirements for trapped-key interlocks: 

 

8.2.1       Multiple trapped-key interlock systems need a complex LOTO procedure specific to the equipment, machine, or system. 

8.2.2       Workers must have equipment-specific training and be qualified, or working under an authorized worker. 

8.2.3       The PIC must control the last single key, usually kept in a group LOTO box. 

8.2.4       Perform Zero Energy Verification (ZEV) and Zero Voltage Verification (ZVV) according to ES&H Manual Chapter 6110 Appendix T4 Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) Zero Energy and Zero Voltage Verification before authorized workers perform work on systems protected by trapped-key interlocks. 

9.0            Non-Electrical Isolation

This section provides examples of non-electrical isolations to illustrate potential methods for use.

 

9.1            Isolate and vert to prevent pressure build-up from a potentially leaking value (pressure transducer used to verify pressure before applying an LOTO – not shown in the pictures).

 

 

Isolate LOTO Bleed

 

 

 

 

 

 9.2      Pneumatically actuated valve (air-to-open, spring-to-close) LOTO-closed

 

                                        Step 1:          Verify pressure indicator against other pressure indicators on instrument air system.

                                        Step 2:          Close, lock, and tag instrument air supply valve. 

                                        Step 3:          Vent instrument air (remove fitting as required). 

                                        Step 4:          Verify control pressure removed and valve closed with local indication. 

 

Inlet and outlet isolation with drain

 

 

 

 

10.0       Revision Summary

TPOC change - 01/28/2023      per CBailey (Industrial Safety Program Lead) change TPOC from TFitzgerald to PStanley; ES&H Manual Editor fixed format only; no content review at this time

Revision 2.1- 02/16/22           Updated information, header, and links. No new approval needed

Revision 2.0- 01/13/21           Updated information, format, and links, Updated header and footer. Approved by the Director and ES&H Director.

Revision 1.5 – 10/23/19         Updated TPOC from T.Kujawa to T.Fitzgerald

Periodic Review – 03/09/18 No changes per TPOC

Revision 1.4 – 03/09/15         Periodic Review; No substantive changes

Revision 1.3 – 02/15/13         Clarified verbiage; No substantive changes

Revision 1.2 – 05/10/12         Clarified verbiage; No substantive changes

Revision 1.1 – 12/01/11         Clarification of process steps and updates made to format. Qualifying periodic review, no substantive changes required.

Revision 1.0 – 04/04/09         Update to reflect current laboratory operations.

 

ISSUING AUTHORITY

TECHNICAL POINT-OF-CONTACT

APPROVAL DATE

NEXT REVIEW DATE

REVIEW CYCLE

rev

 

 

ES&H Division

Phillip Stanley

01.13.2021

01.28.2026

3 years

2.1

 

This document is controlled as an online file.  It may be printed but the print copy is not a controlled document. 

It is the user’s responsibility to ensure that the document is the same revision as the current online file.  This copy was printed on 2/8/2023.