Privacy and Security Notice
seconditr
Heep results after iteration 02/22/06
(rev. 02/23/06)
After inserting the offsets from 02/16/05
into replay, the peaks were shifted from zero by up to 7 MeV (link). This was found to be due to using
approximate offsets for dth_ss, dth_hs, dp_ss and dp_hs.
Therefore, the approximate offsets were used for these quantites and dE
and dp_ss were optimized again to center the peaks near zero.
Here are the new offsets.
Ebeam(GeV)
|
P hms(GeV)
|
TH hms(deg)
|
P sos(GeV)
|
TH sos(deg)
|
dE
|
dth_ss
|
dp_ss
|
dth_hs
|
dp_hs
|
dssxptar
|
2.038
|
-1.692
|
25.005
|
0.874
|
54.90
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.42
|
0.3
|
1.5
|
0.00368
|
5.012
|
4.116
|
18.70
|
-1.7227
|
50.00
|
0.0+0.8
|
0.0
|
10.51-0.8
|
0.3
|
1.5
|
0.00753
|
5.766
|
4.867
|
16.19
|
-1.6868
|
51.61
|
0.0-0.8
|
0.0
|
6.92+0.8
|
0.3
|
1.5
|
0.00674
|
4.021
|
3.232
|
22.15
|
-1.588
|
50.00
|
0.0+0.5
|
0.0
|
2.57-0.4
|
0.3
|
1.5
|
0.00533
|
For reference, here are the results from before the iteration
Ebeam(GeV)
|
P hms(GeV)
|
TH hms(deg)
|
P sos(GeV)
|
TH sos(deg)
|
dE
|
dth_ss
|
dp_ss
|
dth_hs
|
dp_hs
|
dssxptar
|
2.038
|
-1.692
|
25.005
|
0.874
|
54.90
|
0.0
|
0.8
|
0.5
|
1.0
|
1.5
|
0.0036
|
5.012
|
4.116
|
18.70
|
-1.7227
|
50.00
|
0.0
|
-0.3
|
10.2
|
0.2
|
2.4
|
0.008
|
5.766
|
4.867
|
16.19
|
-1.6868
|
51.61
|
0.0
|
0.05
|
7.65
|
-0.05
|
0.8
|
0.0062
|
4.021
|
3.232
|
22.15
|
-1.588
|
50.00
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
1.9
|
0.3
|
2.15
|
0.0052
|
The
iteration shows that that fit for dp_ss needs to be closer to the heep
determined offsets in the second table (the shift in dp_ss from the
iteration is in the direction to correct the fit).
The plots showing the positions of the peaks are here.
They should be compared to the plots here.
The peaks are now centered within about 2.5 MeV of zero, compared to 5
MeV before the iteration.
The new parameterization of dp_ss is shown below

The
solid line is the parameterization
-0.4792+0.0000026*exp(x**5)-0.0028897*exp(x**4)
Note
that the parameterization should not be used above 1.7227 GeV.
For P_sos>1.7227 GeV, use Tanja's parameterization (dashed line)
-0.36-0.0632*exp(x**3.004)
Here is the table of differences
P sos(GeV)
|
dp_ss (heep)
|
dp_ss (fit)
|
0.874
|
0.42
|
0.48
|
-1.7227
|
9.71
|
9.69
|
-1.6868
|
7.72
|
7.74
|
-1.588
|
2.17
|
2.09
|