Privacy and Security Notice
heep
Vertical beam position in OOP offsets
03/27/06
Mark pointed out that the first data point below can not be used
because it has the electron in the HMS rather than the SOS. To
use this setting the equation used to determine the vertical offset was
changed to
xptar_sos -(0.43-1.14*hsp/ssp)*d +
P_hms/P_sos*xptar_hms = 0
Ebeam Phms/Psos Centriod of
ssxptar+(hsp/ssp)*hsxptar [mrad]
----- ----------
-----------------------------------------
2038 1.94
3.50
4021
2.03
5.15
5012
2.89
7.78
5766
2.33
6.29

The fitted line is -3.42 + 3.96(P_hms/P_sos) [mrad]
Vertical beam position in OOP offsets
03/23/06
The heep runs were replayed with all of the previously determined heep
offsets. The previously determined oop offsets were in the
Analyzer, but were not written to the ntuple xptar variables.
Plots of ssxptar*ssp+hsxptar*hsp are here
(bottom right in each panel).
Plots
of xptar_e+(P_p/P_e)*xptar_p are here
(bottom right in each panel).
Instructions from Mark about fitting
the OOP offsets.
Using the new plots, new results were generated for the vertical beam
position.
Ebeam
Phms/Psos Centriod of psos*xptar_sos+phms*xptar_hms
[MeV*rad]
----- ----------
-----------------------------------------
2038
1.94
3.16
4021
2.03
8.17
5012
2.89
13.75
5766
2.33
10.51
I fit a straight line to these values and obtained
intercept = -12.655 [MeV*rad]
slope = 9.3808 [MeV*rad]
However, from the first equation in Mark's instructions, it looks like
I should be plotting
xptar_e + P_p/P_e*xptar_p vs. P_p/P_e
So I did that and here are the results
(Mark also pointed out that the Phms/Psos column should actually be
P_p/P_e, which produced the reciprocal for the 2038 setting)
Ebeam P_p/P_e Centriod of
xptar_e+(P_p/P_e)*xptar_p [rad]
----- ----------
-----------------------------------------
2038 0.52
0.0018
4021
2.03
0.0051
5012
2.89
0.0081
5766
2.33
0.0063
Intercept = 0.277 [mrad]
slope = 2.60 [mrad]
Using the second table
0.277 = 0.43*d - off_sos , if off_sos = 2.6mr then d = 6.7mm
2.60 = -(1.14*d+off_hms) , if off_hms = -1.1mr then d= 1.3mm
These beam offsets do not look even close to the BPM position of 0 +-
0.3mm.
Fit to the results in table 1 (Y axis has the units of MeV*rad)

Fit to the results in table 2 (Y axis has the units of mrad)
