Privacy and Security Notice
coulomb
Modification of Coulomb corrections
05/15/06
The energy shift was changed to the same
as that used in
A. Aste and J. Jourdan, Europhysics Letters, 67 (5), pp753-759 (2004)
(NB proper proton boost was included with these results)
Setting
|
Q2
|
Y_c
|
Y new energy shift
|
4agold
|
1.1
|
33.7635 +- 0.172718 |
33.9866 +- 0.173367
|
1agold
|
2.15
|
15.5426 +- 0.0823212
|
15.617 +- 0.0824693
|
Then the focussing factor was added =
(1+1.5*alpha*Z/R/Ebeam)**2, on top of the previous energy shift change.
Setting
|
Q2
|
Y new energy shift
|
Y new focus factor
|
Y_focus/Y_nofocus
|
(k_i_eff/k_i)**2 |
4agold
|
1.1
|
33.9866 +- 0.173367
|
34.423 +- 0.175593
|
1.0128
|
1.0130 |
1agold
|
2.15
|
15.617 +- 0.0824693
|
15.7777 +- 0.0833179
|
1.0103
|
1.0104 |
Yields with the original SIMC 05/15/06
The yields with the original form of the
Coulomb corrections (Y_c), and without (Y_nc), are shown below
Setting
|
Q2
|
Y_c
|
Y_nc
|
Yc/Ync
|
(k_i_eff/k_i)**2
|
4agold
|
1.1
|
35.2785 +- 0.174364
|
36.0433 +- 0.177847
|
0.979
|
1.0130
|
1agold
|
2.15
|
15.0271 +- 0.0762218
|
15.2798 +- 0.0774787
|
0.983
|
1.0104
|
3agold
|
3.0
|
3.57761 +- 0.0182548
|
3.71562 +- 0.0189825
|
0.963
|
1.0104 |
4acopper
|
1.1
|
81.716 +- 0.407188
|
82.1748 +- 0.409581
|
0.994
|
1.0068
|
1acopper
|
2.15
|
34.7642 +- 0.178414
|
35.0252 +- 0.179221
|
0.993
|
1.0054
|
3acopper
|
3.0
|
8.27303 +- 0.042792
|
8.50825 +- 0.0439159
|
0.972
|
1.0054
|
Results with and without Coulomb
corrections 04/29/06
SIMC was run with Coulomb corrections
turned off (using_Coulomb = 0) and compared to the previous results
with Coulomb corrections turned on.
The results below have NO Pauli blocking or FSI corrections.
They, do have the missing mass shifts suitable for not using Pauli
blocking. The missing mass shifts were unchanged when Coulomb
corrections were turned off.
Conclusions: The missing mass distributions and yields are not
affected significantly by Coulomb corrections. The changes in the
missing mass distributions are so small that it looks like the shifts
do not need to be changed when Coulomb corrections are turned
off. The yields changed, but within statistical
uncertainties. Some distributions changed, however,
like Q2 and phipq for gold.
Missing mass without Coulomb corrections
Missing mass with Coulomb corrections
More results without Coulomb corrections
More results with Coulomb corrections
Status of the default SIMC 04/29/06
(rev. 05/01/06)
I looked through the SIMC code and the incident and scattered electron
energies are corrected for the Coulomb potential.
Here is 1 1/2 pages on the current status of
SIMC Coulomb corrections.
So, it looks like there is no deflection of the electron angle in SIMC
(see John's thesis, pp 156-157) (After contacting John A., the eikonal
approximation is ok. He needed to consider deflections in his
work because the cross section decreased very rapidly for x>1.)
Also, I do not see anywhere the enhancement in the cross section by the
factor (k_i^eff / k_i)**2 (see Dipangkar's thesis, pg 160).
Coulomb corrections to the outgoing pi+ are not present in SIMC.
This changes the energy and momentum of the pi+ by about 20 MeV for the
gold target. (After contacting John A. it now makes a lot of
sense that Coulomb energy shifts are not applied to the hadron.
This is already included to first order in the separation/binding
energy for the hadron. The mass of the target nucleus and the
recoil nucleus are inputs to SIMC, and Coulomb corrections are already
included in the energy and momentum conservation used to calculate the
final kinematics.)