--SRC Index

Updated Ratios (June 22nd, 2010)

On the previous page, I promised that I had included systematic errors, and I had, but then the ratios I printed at the bottom of that page did not include them. So, now I'm actually going through and doing that. If you look closely, you'll notice that some ratios have changed, and that's because the previous ones had oversized statistical errorbars that had not yet been fixed (see brief discussion at the top of previous page.

Unlike the previous page, I also have the high angles here, just because the code gives them, but almost always it's just a point or two, and isn't worth much. Additionally, I start all averaging at x=1.4 this time (I noticed that I wasn't doing x=1.4 vs x=1.6 consistently on the previous page).

2N Ratios to Deuterium

3He
=======================
18 ... 2.0868 +/- 0.0121 ,sys_err= 3.64 %
22 ... 2.2459 +/- 0.0310 ,sys_err= 3.33 %
26 ... 2.3096 +/- 0.0813 ,sys_err= 3.09 %
32 ... 1.1707 +/- 0.1111 ,sys_err= 4.73 %
40 ... 1.7197 +/- 0.4958 ,sys_err= 2.92 %
50 ... 1.4763 +/- 0.5469 ,sys_err= 1.99 %

4He
=======================
18 ... 3.4396 +/- 0.0182 ,sys_err= 3.54 %
22 ... 3.6784 +/- 0.0453 ,sys_err= 3.17 %
26 ... 3.6683 +/- 0.1010 ,sys_err= 2.91 %
32 ... 2.9788 +/- 0.2203 ,sys_err= 4.24 %
40 ... 3.0084 +/- 0.7186 ,sys_err= 2.32 %
50 ... 1.7526 +/- 0.6493 ,sys_err= 1.93 %
Beryllium
=======================
18 ... 3.7441 +/- 0.0201 ,sys_err= 3.51 %
22 ... 3.9289 +/- 0.0431 ,sys_err= 3.15 %
26 ... 4.0279 +/- 0.1033 ,sys_err= 2.9 %
32 ... 1.8630 +/- 0.1608 ,sys_err= 5.4 %
40 ... 3.2155 +/- 0.7478 ,sys_err= 2.32 %
50 ... 1.5440 +/- 0.5720 ,sys_err= 2 %
Carbon
=======================
18 ... 4.5815 +/- 0.0252 ,sys_err= 3.51 %
22 ... 4.8792 +/- 0.0570 ,sys_err= 3.15 %
26 ... 4.8278 +/- 0.1242 ,sys_err= 2.91 %
32 ... 4.9025 +/- 0.3283 ,sys_err= 3.48 %
40 ... 3.7499 +/- 0.8748 ,sys_err= 2.32 %
50 ... 2.1086 +/- 0.7812 ,sys_err= 1.97 %
Coppper
=======================
18 ... 4.8806 +/- 0.0270 ,sys_err= 3.44 %
22 ... 5.1434 +/- 0.0592 ,sys_err= 3.11 %
26 ... 5.2347 +/- 0.1364 ,sys_err= 2.87 %
32 ... 1.7548 +/- 0.1736 ,sys_err= 5.78 %
40 ... 3.9682 +/- 0.9275 ,sys_err= 2.33 %
50 ... 1.9911 +/- 0.7376 ,sys_err= 1.98 %
Gold
=======================
18 ... 4.7830 +/- 0.0267 ,sys_err= 3.7 %
22 ... 5.0631 +/- 0.0591 ,sys_err= 3.31 %
26 ... 5.2281 +/- 0.1355 ,sys_err= 2.91 %
32 ... 2.2313 +/- 0.2122 ,sys_err= 5.65 %
40 ... 3.1754 +/- 0.8521 ,sys_err= 2.37 %

2N Ratios to 3He

4He
=======================
18 ... 1.6505 +/- 0.0070 ,sys_err= 3.67 %
22 ... 1.6441 +/- 0.0204 ,sys_err= 3.34 %
26 ... 1.5532 +/- 0.0458 ,sys_err= 3.16 %
32 ... 1.0689 +/- 0.0828 ,sys_err= 3.28 %
40 ... 1.4099 +/- 0.2472 ,sys_err= 3.25 %
50 ... 1.1872 +/- 0.4983 ,sys_err= 2.28 %

Beryllium
=======================
18 ... 1.7968 +/- 0.0078 ,sys_err= 3.67 %
22 ... 1.7573 +/- 0.0194 ,sys_err= 3.35 %
26 ... 1.7232 +/- 0.0478 ,sys_err= 3.18 %
32 ... 1.4686 +/- 0.0993 ,sys_err= 3.1 %
40 ... 1.5278 +/- 0.2548 ,sys_err= 3.28 %
50 ... 1.0459 +/- 0.4390 ,sys_err= 2.37 %

Carbon
=======================
18 ... 2.1986 +/- 0.0098 ,sys_err= 3.67 %
22 ... 2.1831 +/- 0.0256 ,sys_err= 3.36 %
26 ... 2.0462 +/- 0.0571 ,sys_err= 3.18 %
32 ... 1.6533 +/- 0.1160 ,sys_err= 3.14 %
40 ... 1.4235 +/- 0.2673 ,sys_err= 3.3 %
50 ... 1.4284 +/- 0.5995 ,sys_err= 2.35 %

Copper
=======================
18 ... 2.3466 +/- 0.0105 ,sys_err= 3.61 %
22 ... 2.3136 +/- 0.0267 ,sys_err= 3.32 %
26 ... 2.2617 +/- 0.0634 ,sys_err= 3.15 %
32 ... 2.3140 +/- 0.1509 ,sys_err= 3.02 %
40 ... 1.7825 +/- 0.3081 ,sys_err= 3.29 %
50 ... 1.3488 +/- 0.5661 ,sys_err= 2.37 %

Gold
=======================
18 ... 2.3017 +/- 0.0105 ,sys_err= 3.87 %
22 ... 2.2726 +/- 0.0267 ,sys_err= 3.51 %
26 ... 2.2712 +/- 0.0633 ,sys_err= 3.21 %
32 ... 2.2066 +/- 0.1567 ,sys_err= 3.19 %
40 ... 0.8385 +/- 0.1753 ,sys_err= 3.43 %

F(y) for Deuterium (June 22nd, 2010)

John asked me to throw up a plot of the F(y) for deterium as well as the calculations for comparison. I think this is because at some point we talked about starting the paper by talking about momentum distributions and show the deuterium scaling function there. By looking at the plot, you can see that the inelastic contribution has been subtracted.