Photoproduction background MC for GLUEX
Introduction
The goal is to simulate hadronic photoproduction in the full range
of the beam energies - from the thereshold of 0.15 GeV to the maximum of 12 GeV.
The procedure is as follows:
- The photon energy is simulated, in a given range, accordingly to the coherent
Bremsstrahlung spectrum,
times the total photoproduction cross section at the given energy.
- If the photon energy is greater than some limit, 3 GeV by default,
the interaction is simulated using PYTHIA.
- Otherwise, for lower energies, the type of interaction is randomly chosen
from a list of 10 exclusive reactions, dominant at these energies. The
differential cross sections of these reaction are parametrized using
the existing experimental data.
Beam
The coherent Bremsstrahlung spectrum is simulated using a routine cobrems.F
extracted from the HDGeant code. The settings were as follows:
- 76 m distance from the diamond crystal to the collimator;
- 3.4 mm diameter collimator;
- 20 μm crystal thickness;
- 11.7 cm - the radiation length of the crystal.
From this, I would expect an incoherent photon flux without collimation, in the energy range
2-11.8 GeV, of 20·10-6/0.117·log(11.8/2.)=0.00030 per one incoming
electron. The code gives a value of 0.00024, about 25% lower, which seems reasonable.
With a collimator 3.4mm diameter, the code gives the incoherent photon flux of
3.8·10-5 per electron,
in the same energy range.
The beam spectrum and the photoproduction hadronic rate are presented on the next figure.
Photoproduction cross section
The full photoproduction cross section along with the partial cross sections
important below 2 GeV are presented on the next picture.
Simulation code
The code is available in the GLUEX repository src/programs/Simulation/bggen
This directory contains a README file with a manual.
Beam
The coherent Bremsstrahlung code from R.Jones is used.
Processes
The following processes are included:
Processes considered
The processes 1-10 are chosen randomly for each event, depending
on their cross sections. The processes 4, 5 and 11 produce the
same final state. The process 3 is artificially added, as a difference
between the full process 11 and the resonant processes 4 and 5.
# |
Process |
Experimental data |
Source of Simulation |
Comment |
σ(E) |
dσ/dΩ |
Rate |
distribution |
1 |
p πo |
0.15 - 2.00 GeV |
dσ/d(cosθCM) |
SAID |
SAID |
|
2 |
n π+ |
0.15 - 2.00 GeV |
dσ/d(cosθCM) |
SAID |
SAID |
|
3 |
p π+ π- |
|
|
#11-#4-#5 |
phase space |
Non-resonant contribution, #11-#4-#5 |
4 |
p ρ° |
1.00 - 2.50 GeV |
dσ/dt |
exper, extrapolated |
exper dσ/dt |
Resonance ρ°→π+ π- : sinθCM |
5 |
Δ++ π- |
0.40 - 3.00 GeV |
dσ/dt |
exper, extrapolated |
exper dσ/dt |
Resonance Δ++ → p π+ |
6 |
p π° π° |
0.40 - 0.80 GeV |
|
exper, extrapolated |
phase space |
|
7 |
n π+ π° |
0.40 - 0.80 GeV |
|
exper, extrapolated |
phase space |
|
8 |
p η |
0.70 - 2.50 GeV |
dσ/d(cosθCM) |
exper, extrapolated |
exper dσ/d(cosθCM) |
dσ/d(cosθCM)(E) - polynomial fit |
9 |
p π+ π- π° |
1.50 - 10.0 GeV |
|
exper, extrapolated |
phase space |
|
10 |
n π+ π+ π- |
1.50 - 10.0 GeV |
|
exper, extrapolated |
phase space |
|
11 |
p π+ π- |
0.40 - 12.0 GeV |
dσ/dt |
|
|
Used for σ(E) shape, and for #3 |
The process 11 is used to evaluate the non-resonant process 3. The
measured t-dependence for the non-resonant process happens to be
close to the t-dependence for the iniform phase space production,
therefore no additional correction to the "phase-space simulation" was done.
E-Mail :
gen@jlab.org
Last updated: Oct 30, 2007