The Hall A Scattering Chamber Bremsstrahlung radiator built in 2006
is similar in principle, but much modified in design from the previous Hall A
radiator
system built in 1999 by S Esp and R Gilman and successfully
operated
in Hall A. The 1999 system was in turn based on the Hall
C radiator system built by David Meekins and successfully operated
in Hall C.
The main similarities are that both systems use an Oregon Micro
Systems VME
44 controller to control an Oregon Micro Systems MH10DX step motor
driver,
which drives a Slo-Syn M063-LS09 stepper motor, to control the radiator
assembly, so that one can position any (or none) of several oxygen-free
Cu foils in the beam. Both systems are designed so that the foils can
be moved with beam on. The main differences are the following:
An image of the
radiator system is shown to the right.
The motor and rotary feedthrough define a central horizontal axis of
the system, which is parallel to the beam axis, about which the target
assembly rotates. Note that the rotational axis may be tilted
slightly, leading to a 1/cos(theta) increase in the target thickness.The radiator targets are used in conjunction with a moderate energy, moderate current beam, leading to a large radiation background in the Hall. No local shielding is added, as calculations indicate that this will not significantly affect dose at the site boundary.
Special
Instructions: The radiator is now being manually
controlled in the counting house. The manual operating instructions are
here.
The only non-expert operational control consists of moving
the radiator target assembly to one of seven designated positions, the
six foil positions, one with no foils and five with foils, or the out
limit. Software controls of the ladder position are operated
by MCC, using EPICS software developed by David Wetherholt of the
accelerator
division. Calibration constants have been determined to position the
foils; any recalibrations need to be coordinated with D Wetherholt.
While there is no position feedback except that provided by the OMS
VME44 controller, the calibration can be confirmed by monitoring target
ion chamber levels vs OMS VME44 position. A standard will be measured
during the initial commissioning of the radiator. The radiator
may be moved when beam is on target. The motion speed is sufficient to
move between foil adjacent positions in several seconds, and across the
full range of foil positions in about 30 s. The current speed results
from a combination of software settings with a 50:1 gear reducer, on
loan from D Meekins for the initial experiments.
There are several notes concerning radiator operations:
A backup manual system is in principle available to control the MH10DX step motor driver. The backup system uses a function generator and switch box that is set up in the Hall A in the counting house. The VME 44 controller and the backup system cannot both be hooked up to the control box at the same time. The only people authorized to use the manual control system are R Gilman, D Higinbotham, and S Strauch. Using the backup system requires calibrating it. The function generator is owned and being used by the polarized 3He target, so at present the backup system cannot be easily implemented.
Because the radiator is not water cooled, it is planned for initial commissioning to operate the radiator only at currents up to 5 µA. This leads to an estimated temperature rise of 30 K in the anodized aluminum target assembly, and about 130 K in a 4 (±2) mm square beam spot. The radiator should always be operated with a 4 (±2) mm raster at its maximum current of 5 µA. At lower currents, the raster area may be scaled down proportionally to the current. The current limits depend on radiation levels, monitored by the target ion chambers, and radiator temperature, nomitored by an RTD, and might be changed as a result of the commissioning data.
While the radiator increases the background radiation
in the hall, ion chamber trip levels appear to be sufficiently
high that this is not a problem for normal operations. Trips levels
are generally set to ~25 kRad/hr, while data taking with the 6% foil at
about 800 MeV beam energy and 30 µA generates
about 1.5 kRad/hr. At the lower beam energies intended for the new
scattering chamber radiator, we have no operational experience. It is
expected that the radiator thickness
will have to be limited to below 6%, because of beam blowup, to ensure
the quality of the data. The thickest foil currently installed is 5%.
When the radiator is not being used, the system
should be set to the out-limit or no-foil positions. In either
position, the
radiator is entirely clear of the beam, with all apertures at least
~1.5 cm from the beam.
Power to the control box, and the separate power supply, may be
turned off with
a front-panel switches if the radiator will not be used for a long time
-
and should be turned off if work is to be done on the radiator. This
deactivates the limit switches, preventing software monitoring of the
radiator,
but does not affect its position. Both the gear reducer and the torque
of
the motor should prevent any motion of the ladder. The Hall
A technical staff checklist, done as part of preparations for closing
the
Hall for beam, includes checking the radiator position and the status
of the
control box.
The radiator positioning may be incorrect due
to an iochla reboot or to pressing the stop button on the GUI. It is
crucial to move the radiator to the out limit to re-establish the
positioning information in the VME44 controller. This normally happens
as part of the reboot procedure, but if it does not the operator should
try to move the radiator to the out limit, and should not try to move the radiator to any
other position.
If the radiator does not move, there are possible
problems either with the state of the software or the hardware.
It has been found, for example, that some EDM windows need to be closed
and reopened after IOCHLA reboots to function. Rebooting iochla, which
takes about 3 minutes, may solve problems. (The readback fields should
go "white".) If the radiator cannot be made to move, possible
hardware failures need to be investigated. Check the control power
supplies in the
hall for about 1.6 Amp holding current on the
control box, and 26 V and 0.5 Amps on the power supply. If turning
these two
boxes off and on does not restore correct values,
experts are needed: D Wetherholt is the software expert, while R
Gilman and S Strauch are the hardware experts.
Pictures of the new scattering chamber radiator can be found here. The pictures will
also be coped to the experiment
web
site picture section
in the near future.
For pictures of the 1999 radiator assembly before installation, the "cross" on the vacumm chamber, and the water cooler, try here.
For pictures of the installed 1999 radiator, the copper foils and
target
ladder after exposure to beam and the tagged assembly, try
here.
The design for the Brem Radiator for Hall A was done
by Susan Esp. The radiator was constructed largely by Rutgers
University
using the Physics Department machine shop. Assembly was done by J Dumas
(RU), G Kumbartzki (RU), Y Rousseau (RU), and S Strauch (SC).
Additional installation work was done by Ed Folts (Hall A). The system
reuses the controls of the 1999 radiator system, which were partly
bought by Rutgers University, and partially contructed by David
Meekins (then with FSU) and Rutgers personnel. EPICS software was
developed
by David Wetherholt (Accelerator).
Jack Segal (Hall A) also contributed to assembly and debugging of the
new radiator system.
In case of problems with the radiator, one should contact the people mentioned above for specific details, and / or
Care must be taken in case of any removal or disassembly of the radiator system is needed. The stepper motor should not be disconnected from the motor driver while power is on; this can lead to damage to the motor and or motor driver.
The Cu targets will certainly be activated in
the course of an experiment. Therefore, only remove the Cu target, the
target ladder, and / or the whole radiator system after coordinating
with
Radcon.