Privacy and Security Notice

GWU Status Report: March-12-08

GWU Status Report: March-12-08




Scintillator Tests

The trigger scintillators are in our lab at the Asburn, VA GWU campus. As a reminder here is the schematic:

Burnham came to visit us in February, bringing the support stands from JLab and helping us set up one of the scintillators. Here are some pictures: (can click image for fullsize)


Here is the scintillator in the nice support frame (legs have been removed):

Attaching the PMT's:

My first wrapping job!:

Burnham and Allena hard at work:

View of the whole setup:


Here are spectra from when the top and bottom paddles that define the coincidence are placed over the center of the scintillator (X = 110 cm):

TDC Channels:

QDC Channels:

And here are spectra when the top and bottom paddles are placed 20 cm from the left end (X = 20 cm):

TDC Channels:

QDC Channels:

And a table comparing peaks for the TDC and QDC values of the left and right:

Table 1: TDC and QDC peak values (QDC with pedestal subtracted)
TDC Ch. X=20 cm X=110 cm QDC Ch. X=20 cm X=110 cm
1 (left) 380 560 1 (left) 3430 1901
2 (right) 744 560 2 (right) 1241 1860

Notice that the change in the TDC channels are both ~180 channels (and in the correct direction)!

Each channel corresponds to 35 picoseconds, so this time difference is 6.3 ns. The difference in distance is 0.9 m, which gives a speed of light in the scintillator of 1.4*10^8 m/s. This gives an index of refraction of 2.1. Note that the index of refraction for diamond is 2.4. It is unlikely that Saint-Gobain sent us diamond instead of BC408, which has n = 1.58.

Using n = 1.58, the speed of light in BC408 is 1.9*10^8 m/s; in 6.3 ns light should travel 1.2 m in BC408. Is it possible that the extra bounces to get into the pmt would effectively increase the distance from 0.9 m to 1.2 m?


Shielding Wall Simulations

See the shielding wall webpage located here.