Middle of PbWO4: plots HYCAL hits in x, Veto hits in x, cluster x-y distribution, and the ration of Veto hits over HYCAL hits by x.

Bottom of PbWO4: plots HYCAL hits in x, Veto hits in x, cluster x-y distribution, and

Top of PbWO4: plots HYCAL hits in x, Veto hits in x, cluster x-y distribution, and

Comparison of the efficiency for middle(black), bottom(red), and top(green) position of HYCAL runs.

Next, I analyzed almost all of the PbWO4 calibration runs to see the y-position dependence of the efficiency.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||
| HYCAL y=-22 |
![]() |
| HYCAL y=-8 | ![]() |
| HYCAL y=15 |
![]() |
| HYCAL y=22 |
![]() |
In this set of plots, I used a 3rd order polynomial fit to the background instead of the gaussian.
| HYCAL y=15 |
![]() |
Here I am showing the neutral efficiency for Veto counter 3 centered at x=-25cm with various ADC cuts. The data points are as follows:

For these two plots, I am showing the HYCAL x vs y (left) and the HYCAL x vs Veto y (right) for run 5353.

Now, I want to test ADC cuts on the charged-particle efficiency. Below are ADC spectra for counter #3(x=-25cm) from a pair production run(4865) and from a photon calibration run(5353).

Here are plots of HYCAL hits(top,left), veto hits(top,right), HYCAL x vs y(bottom,left), and veto efficiency(bottom,right) when the ADC cut is set at channel 400.

Here is a comparison of efficiency with 4 different ADC thresholds.
|
![]() |
For these two plots, I am showing the HYCAL x vs y (left) and the HYCAL x vs Veto y (right) for pair production run 4865.
