1. A full collaboration member who supervises
a postdoctoral researcher assigned to work on Hall B instrumentation and/or
experiments may designate him/her as a term member of the CLAS Collaboration.
A full collaboration member who supervises a graduate student who is assigned
a thesis project based on Hall B instrumentation and/or experiments may
designate him/her as a term member of the CLAS Collaboration.
2. Designation as a term member must be submitted
to the Chairperson of the Coordinating Committee in writing and must be
renewed annually.
3. Any individual recommended for term membership
must be approved by a four-fifths vote of the Coordinating Committee.
4. Term members may be authors on those CLAS publications
to which they make significant contributions.
5. Term members may be considered for full membership.
1. Recommendation for limited membership must be
in writing and submitted to the Chairperson of the Coordinating Committee
by a spokesperson for a proposal.
2. Any individual recommended for limited membership
must be approved by a four-fifths vote of the Coordinating Committee.
3. A limited member will have no voting rights and
will be included as an author only on the papers which result from those
proposals for which he/she has been approved for limited membership
1. Every full member of the Collaboration will
have the right to vote in the election of members.
2. Elections for membership will take place
at collaboration meetings.
3. Membership elections will be by secret
ballot. A member may submit a ballot prior to the collaboration
meeting by mail or by electronic mail.
4. It is the responsibility of the Membership
Committee to oversee membership elections.
5. The names of the individuals being considered
in membership elections must be made known to the Collaboration at least
30 days prior to the election. The announcement must include whether
the individuals are being considered for addition or deletion and whether
they are being considered for full or limited membership. Notification
by mail or electronic mail is considered sufficient.
B. Changes in the Collaboration Charter shall require a two-thirds majority of those full members who actually cast a yes or no vote on the specific issue.
C. Changes in the Collaboration Charter may not be voted on at the same collaboration meeting at which they are proposed.
D. The Coordinating Committee will be responsible for overseeing ballots to modify the Collaboration Charter.
E. All other matters brought to a vote
at a regular meeting will be decided by a majority of those present unless
specified otherwise in this Charter.
Structure of the nucleon
Nuclear Multihadron Reactions
Real photon experiments
B. Subsystems of Hall B instrumentation
will be designed and their construction, commissioning, and
maintenance will be coordinated by such
Technical Working Groups as may be established
by the Coordinating Committee or the Collaboration at large.
1. Any matter on which there is more than one
dissenting vote shall be brought to the Collaboration for a vote.
2. The Coordinating committee shall also monitor
the progress in design and construction of Hall B instrumentation.
3. The Chairperson of the Coordinating Committee
shall promptly inform the members of the Collaboration in writing of all
actions taken by the Coordinating Committee.
B. The Chairperson of the Coordinating Committee shall be the collaboration spokesperson and the principal contact to the CEBAF directorate for the CLAS Collaboration. He/she will have overall responsibility for assuring smooth operation of the Collaboration. The Chairperson shall be elected to a term of TWO years. In the absence of extenuating circumstances, it is expected but not required that the incumbent not be renominated. Apart from this strong preference against contiguous terms, there is no lifetime limit on service in this office.
C. The Hall B Program Manager is appointed by the CEBAF management. He/she will have responsibility for the overall organization and management of the construction and operation of the Hall B instrumentation.
D. (Technical Committee removed July '03. Lettering retained to preserve later cross reference links in .html version)
E. The remaining members of the Coordinating Committee (excluding the Chairperson of the Coordinating Committee and the Hall B Program Manager) shall be elected for terms of one year, with no limitation on succession. ...(removed Technical Committee and Hall B Engineer)
F. The members of the Coordinating Committee must be full members of the Collaboration. ...(removed Technical Committee)
G. The Membership Committee will consist of one full collaboration member from each institution involved in the Collaboration. An institution is intended to mean CEBAF, another national laboratory, or a university, and not individual groups, centers or institutes within these entities. The Membership Committee is responsible for managing the collaboration membership, supervising the nomination and election of the Chairperson of the Coordinating Committee, and determining the authorship of publications.
1. The representative from a given institution is
determined at the discretion of the full collaboration members at that
institution. The representative for each institution will notify
the Chairperson of the Coordinating Committee of his/her selection.
If an institution fails to appoint a representative, the Coordinating Committee
will appoint a representative for that institution.
2. The Membership Committee will be headed by a
chairperson who is selected annually by the Membership Committee.
3. The Membership Committee must meet at least once
a year.
4. The Membership Committee will review the status
of members and make recommendations to the Collaboration concerning the
addition and deletion of members.
5. The Membership Committee will determine the limited
and term members who are eligible for authorship
on each publication.
6. The Membership Committee will nominate suitable
candidates for the Chairperson of the Coordinating Committee and notify
the members of the Collaboration of the list of nominees at least 30 days
prior to the election of the Chairperson of the Coordinating Committee.
7. The Membership Committee will supervise the election
of the Chairperson of the Coordinating Committee.
8. The responsibilities of the Membership Committee
do not affect the rights granted to full members of the Collaboration.
Specifically, any full member of the Collaboration may nominate candidates
for Chairperson of the Coordinating Committee at any time prior to the
election, and may recommend individuals for addition to or deletion from
Collaboration membership.
B. Every full and term member of the Collaboration will have the right to vote in one and only one Physics Working Group. ...(removed Technical Group).
C. Physics Working Groups will be responsible for organizing the election of their representatives. ...(removed Technical Group)
D. Election of new committee members, including the Chairperson of the Coordinating Committee, will take place at the last scheduled collaboration meeting during the Spring so that new members may take their positions starting September 1 of each year.
E. Election of the Chairperson of the Coordinating Committee will be by secret ballot. A member may submit his/her ballot prior to the collaboration meeting by mail or by electronic mail.
F. Election of the Chairperson of the Coordinating Committee requires a plurality of the votes cast.
G. A special election may be called by the Coordinating Committee to replace the Chairperson of the Coordinating Committee as needed.
1. Members must be notified of a special election
at least 30 days prior to the special election.
2. Notification of the special election may be by
mail or electronic mail.
3. A special election may take place at any time.
B. The Coordinating Committee shall meet
as required. ...(removed
Technical Committee)
B. The spokespersons for these proposals must be members of the Collaboration. ...(removed "full members")
C. The Coordinating Committee is responsible
for communicating recommendations for the scheduling of Hall B experiments
to the CEBAF management. These recommendations shall be based primarily
on readiness to run the experiment, the natural progression of the technical
equipment, the contributions of the experimenters to the Collaboration,
and any priorities attached to the experiments by the PAC.
1. The lead author of a paper reporting the
result of a Hall B experiment will submit a pre-publication draft to the
Chairperson of the Coordinating Committee.
2. The Chair of the Coordinating Committee,
or a member of the Coordinating Committee designated by the Chair, will
immediately appoint an ad hoc committee of two or three individuals to
review the paper and assist the lead author in getting it accepted by the
Collaboration.
3. If the ad hoc committee recommends publication,
the document will be made available to each Collaboration Member for comments.
All responses concerning the document shall be addressed to both the author
and the ad hoc committee. The Chair of the
Coordinating Committee will specify a deadline for responses.
4. After the lead author and the ad hoc committee
have addressed the comments from collaboration members --
if, in the judgment of the members of the Ad Hoc Committee, major rewriting
of the paper or sections of the paper have taken place as a result of member's
comments, the revised paper will again
be made available, in the manner specified in XI.A.3, for final approval
by the Collaboration.
5. Any disapproval on the part of the whole
Collaboration or members of the Collaboration should be communicated to
both the ad hoc committee and the authors. The ad hoc committee may
withdraw its recommendation for publication at any time before final approval.
Approval for publication is automatically granted following the specified
deadline unless the ad hoc committee withdraws its approval, or the author
changes the content of the paper. Changes to correct grammatical
errors or to incorporate minor modifications suggested by referees are
not considered changes in the content of the paper.
6. If a paper is rejected by the Ad hoc committee,
the authors may rewrite and resubmit the paper. The review process
outlined in Articles XI.A.2 through XI.A.5 will be repeated. In case
of conflict the Coordinating Committee as a whole will review the draft
and recommend for or against publication. If the paper is rejected
by the Coordinating Committee, the author may submit the paper to the full
Collaboration for majority approval at a collaboration meeting.
B. All full and term
collaboration members (who were members at the time the data were taken)
will be included in the author list if they actively
select to be included using procedures and/or mechanisms established by
the Coordinating Committee. The membership committee will
maintain a database that shall be used to decide which names (full &
term) are eligible to appear on the
publication. It is the responsibility of the lead authors to initially
determine which limited members (if any) shall be included on the author
list (consistent with the provisions of II.C.3 of this Charter).
In case of disputes, the CLAS coordinating committee (in consultation with
members of the membership committee) will make the final decisions on authorship.
B. All invitations for talks based on CLAS results fall under the purview of the CLAS Speakers Committee. Members who receive invitations for such talks will forward those invitations to the CLAS Coordinating Committee and the CLAS Speakers' Committee.
C. The CLAS Speakers Committee shall act in accordance with bylaws approved by the Collaboration for that committee.
D. The CLAS Coordinating Committee will act
as a final arbiter of disagreements with decisions made by the CLAS Speakers'
Committee.
(removed
Article XII re: completion of first round of experiments)
Legacy link for old language regarding composition of technical groups, removed in Summer '03 revisions