Privacy and Security Notice

jan05



  Hall C Jan05 (JLAB experiments E02-109 and E04-001):




  Analysis Meeting 3 (4/20/05)

1) Tracking Efficiency - Analysis and Recalculation with
Scintillation rate dependence factored out.

2) All Luminosity Scans for Target Density
Corrections calculated

3) Monte Carlo Comparisons for Carbon completed-yet still
preliminary until Radiative Corrections are calculated.


Tracking Efficiency
For previous results, see meeting01 and meeting02.  

In general, tracking eff is calculated as:

Eff(Tracking) = (TRG & PID & TR) / (TRG & PID)

where TRG: formed trigger, TR: found track, PID: particle id cut

After seeing no improvement in Tracking Eff. for meetings 01 and 02 we concluded
that the calibration was not the issue. 

track eff




Tracking Eff vs. W^2.

track w


Tracking Eff. vs. Run #.  Here we see the region(~52860-53100) where eff. fluctuated significantly.
Although we've factored out rate dependence, this region is still lacking eff.

track run


Target Density Corrections - Luminosity Scans

Target Density Corrections refer to factoring in the change of density that
occurs for liquid targets that are in the path of the electron beam. As the liquid target heats up from the
beam, localized changes in density occur
(often referred to as a "boiling effect"). To correct for this we've
plotted the yield vs. increasing current, otherwise known as a Luminosity scan.


The Yield and Error were calculated by:

Y = (Pre-Scale)*(# of electron events)/ (Track_eff*LiveTime*Charge)

Error Y = Y / sqrt( # of electron events)

To obtain the # of electron events, I applied cuts on the Calorimeter (shower
track) to get a clean sample of electrons without pions. These cuts were:

Cer>2
Cal>0


Where Cer refers to the # of photoelectrons produced in the Cerenkov detector.
For electrons there are usually 10 whereas pions are usually at zero
photoelectrons.
Cal refers to the energy received in the calorimeter divided by the energy of
the outgoing particle (Ecal/E'). We expect electrons to deposit all their
energy in the calorimeter so Cal~1.

On this page, we plotted Luminosity scans for LD2(1,2), LH2 and two
solid targets, C and Fe. The solid targets were
scanned for comparison and do not show evidence of any "boiling" as

expected by their fairly constant slope. For LD2, the yield decreases with
current which indicates some change in density.

Here all Luminosity Scans have been plotted in the kinematics of:

E'= 2.0 GeV and Theta = 20.00 Degrees

Slope and error has been calculated in % per 100uA for each scan.

The runs used to make these scans are as follows:

LD2(1): 52544-9
LD2(2): 52691, 52694-8
LH2: 52537-52542
C: 52550-5
Fe: 52687-52690


LD2 (1)
LD2(1)
 


LD2(2)
LD2(2)



LH2
H 


Carbon
C

Iron
Fe



 
Monte Carlo Comparisons for Carbon

mc comp







 Maintained by Jim Steinman